Wednesday, October 08, 2008
Selma Sees
Dancer in the Dark (2000) a film by Lars von Trier is a dramatic musical that tells the tale of a single mother slowly going blind in the real world while escaping the harsh truth of this expected darkness deep within her own colorful imagination. What is left of her vision is trapped behind black, bulky frames encompassing lenses, two-inches thick making her eyes look twice their size against her pale skin and small stature.
Singer/Songwriter Bjork stars as Selma, a young woman who sought refuge in America to seek a miracle cure that would save her ten-year old son from suffering the same fate: losing the ability to see.
Bjork displays such raw talent bringing Selma to life. Dressed in bland garments of grays and dark blues with uncombed hair and no make-up, we lose the sight of her as a popular performer in real life and become more transfixed with her character’s childlike demeanor on-screen. She is Selma and with her frail state and soft-spoken voice it makes it almost impossible not to empathize with her desperation throughout the film. We allow ourselves to fall into her and let her lead us into Selma’s musical mind so we too can see what Selma sees. Her place is stuck out in the middle of nowhere. Her routine is a boring means to an end, living within the cramped walls of her little mobile home. We are consumed with Selma’s fear that this illness is hereditary and certain. Though she tries to push herself no matter what the cost bears onto her health, as her vision blurs one thing remains clear, her ability is limited because of a disability she finds difficult to admit to anyone. Once she trusts enough to share her secret, a dramatic turn of events will take you to a jaw-dropping finale that will leave you stunned!
Subtle hints throughout the film illustrate the progression of the disease. We see Selma place her index finger half-way inside a glass so that she knows to stop pouring once the water touches the end of her fingertip. We see her gazing up inside a theatre as her friend narrates the movement of the images before her. As she sees less and less, it becomes almost too unbearable for the audience to just sit and watch until we reach a twisted turning point we never saw coming. The quality of the film looks as if it were shot entirely by a hand-held video camera, complete with shaky scenes and out-of-focus takes. This makes the viewer feel as if it is all happening in real time, as if we are staring out from inside Selma’s fading eyes and watching as her story unfolds.
This film is not your typical musical by any means since it chose to conduct its performances off-stage without any glamour shots, high-kicks, bright lights, and flashy costumes. Each beautiful piece of music is created using the everyday conundrum of Selma’s world to let us explore the contents within her mind. Every ‘clank’ is a chime. Every ‘bang’ is a beating drum. Every ‘whoosh’ is a two-step and ‘whish’ a twirling finish. In “I’ve Seen It All,” Selma takes us on no ordinary train ride. As she sings to drown out the noise and daydreams to get away, we find ourselves dreaming with her even for a moment to do the same.
Image provided by:
http://www.movieposter.com/posters/archive/main/22/A70-11479
Monday, June 02, 2008
What happened to SEX?
I did it. I caved in and believed that TV can translate well on the big screen with no problem. So I put on my favorite pair of red sandals and strutted with the rest of them to see the highly anticipated HBO craze Sex and the City: The Movie.
I no longer saw Carrie Bradshaw. I saw Sarah Jessica Parker. A frighteningly skinny SJP with way too little clothing and way too much eye make-up dancing around in the most bizarre wardrobe imaginable and not even sporting enough great footwear.
Where the hell were all the PRETTY shoes I longed to wear?!!!! The only ones that got any attention debuted in a closet and made its mark as the corniest proposal ever (and no I wouldn't wear them)!
A lot of things were lacking. Speaking of which, where the hell was the real Samantha with her outrageous sex appeal and quirkiness? They gave Kim Cattrall a slight gut and a possible eating disorder rather than tangling her up in one of her many titillating affairs and then proceeded to cast her in the shortest sex scene ever and it was under the covers! Her hot new neighbor got more action and all she could do was watch from behind glass doors! On a lighter note (if you can even call it that) is seeing perfect Charlotte York (Kristin Davis) do the unthinkable because she just couldn't hold it in any longer! The surprise for me was for the first time ever, Miranda (Cynthia Nixon) was more fashionable then the rest of the trio put together!
Oh and what the f*%k happened to the men? Dashing and daring Mr. Big seemed like a lost puppy with nowhere else to turn to. Steve threw away his great wit and charm for a one-time fling. Harry's romantic humor was left on the sidelines while Smith, who wanted more than just to be a "sex object" left us with well, not much else. I mean, they just sprinkled the boys in wherever they could but it didn't really connect to the story. Why were they staying monotonous or in Big's case, creating drama by reenacting bad habits? Even the once coy Stanford and sassy Anthony had nothing more to do besides make their cameos and end it all with a forgettable kiss.
Sigh... where was the snappy dialogue and the true comradery of being able to say what was on your mind no matter what the consequences? Who in the world decided that the most controversial word would be "sex?!" I mean, seriously "C-U-Next-Tuesday" had more oomph than that! Where was the courage of walking on your own two feet after a heavy breakup? I wanted to see HIM hurt, not her. He REALLY needed to be in some kind of real pain. Having wine and feeling lonely in a room full of people is just not mean enough. I wanted BLOOD, really. It all seemed too pathetic. It all felt too rehearsed. Argue, cry, smile...now "action!" It didn't feel like it was happening in real time. It felt like the characters knew they had to bring it altogether in a little over 2-hours and that's the limits of making a movie...a forced end.
Although the movie looks promising, it's full of cliches and scattered with emotionless stories that lacked real content and it failed to highlight the one thing that made this show unique: the goal-oriented, "I don't need a man to complete me" women. They even clumsily tossed in Jennifer Hudson (who I was hoping would crack some common sense into Carrie) only to have her leave for yes, you guessed it: a man! It's as if the writers were purposely sticking to the fairytale ending: marry a man, settle down and have kids. And if you don't, you'll be celebrating your 50th with friends who are stable in their own lives while you're still trying to find yourself. What?! Why not focus on more serious plots: Samantha's recovery or even Steve's mother's battle with Alzheimer's rather than the too-good-to-be-true, bogus reassurance that through it all it's still worth it to tie the knot? And if so, can you at least give me a break and throw in more sex?!
I couldn't help but wonder...